Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Talk:Free Service Definition: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GabrielBurt (talk | contribs) (initial version) |
(discrimination) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome to the Free Service Definition talk page. Please use this page for discussion threads. | Welcome to the [[Free Service Definition]] talk page. Please use this page for discussion threads. | ||
== discrimination == | |||
I think that a FSD needs to ensure that the service does not discriminate in ways that interfere with our essential freedoms. This needs to be tempered so that it doesn't unnecessarily restrict the ability for a service provider to manage the roll out of their own for-profit ventures. I haven't thought of precise wording as yet, so examples are the best way to present the idea: | |||
;Acceptable: | |||
* Gmail invite-only rollout. This was a novel way to roll out, and the discrimination was done by the users rather than the service provider | |||
* MTurk "hit" providers being restricted to US/UK citizens. Legal restrictions are unavoidable. | |||
;Not desirable: | |||
* Mandatory profile fields that are used primarily for profiling or discrimination is not in the spirit of freedom. e.g. requiring a US postal address unless the user has requested that the service deliver something to them. Profile fields should be opt-in, where the user wants to be better served. | |||
* Preventing or controlling access to a service based on IP address. Service providers should not use artificial ways to assume nationality. | |||
** Preventing access from anonymiser systems, such as Tor. This would mean that "Wikipedia" is a FCD to access, but editing Wikipedia would not be an FCD. See [[m:Editing with Tor]] for more details. | |||
** "Google Search Australia" being inaccessible from IP addresses presumed to be from a different nation (this is just an example; Google doesnt currently do this). | |||
[[User:Jayvdb|Jayvdb]] 05:06, 27 October 2007 (CEST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:06, 27 October 2007
Welcome to the Free Service Definition talk page. Please use this page for discussion threads.
discrimination[edit]
I think that a FSD needs to ensure that the service does not discriminate in ways that interfere with our essential freedoms. This needs to be tempered so that it doesn't unnecessarily restrict the ability for a service provider to manage the roll out of their own for-profit ventures. I haven't thought of precise wording as yet, so examples are the best way to present the idea:
- Acceptable
- Gmail invite-only rollout. This was a novel way to roll out, and the discrimination was done by the users rather than the service provider
- MTurk "hit" providers being restricted to US/UK citizens. Legal restrictions are unavoidable.
- Not desirable
- Mandatory profile fields that are used primarily for profiling or discrimination is not in the spirit of freedom. e.g. requiring a US postal address unless the user has requested that the service deliver something to them. Profile fields should be opt-in, where the user wants to be better served.
- Preventing or controlling access to a service based on IP address. Service providers should not use artificial ways to assume nationality.
- Preventing access from anonymiser systems, such as Tor. This would mean that "Wikipedia" is a FCD to access, but editing Wikipedia would not be an FCD. See m:Editing with Tor for more details.
- "Google Search Australia" being inaccessible from IP addresses presumed to be from a different nation (this is just an example; Google doesnt currently do this).
Jayvdb 05:06, 27 October 2007 (CEST)