Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Abuse filter log

Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse log)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Details for log entry 116,136

07:32, 9 December 2016: 5.189.182.40 (talk) triggered filter 0, performing the action "edit" on Discussion of copyleft. Actions taken: Disallow; Filter description: (examine)

Changes made in edit

Are there differences between free software, free culture and free knowledge?
This is a very fantastic web design and is what I'm looking for. It has a lot of different kinds of knowledge I am forever trying to learn extra information concerning it. Thanks for making the site you have done a great job and I am sure lots of users will enjoy the site as well. I am an  <a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com/index-3.html>seo company colorado</a> and also see that you've done an excellent job in the area too and if you need any extra with the seo send me a pm and I will give you a few pointers. If you need <a href=http://www.flageliteclean.com>carpet cleaning flagstaff</a>, my sister has a good service set up in FLagstaff Arizona, you can learn more info about it here.<a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com>best seo companies in phoenix"</a>|<a href="http://www.flageliteclean.com">house cleaning and cleaner services in flagstaff az</a>
We seem to be basing the definitions on free software - but is there a point where the analogy does not quite hold? Or where we might need to take a stronger stand on copyleft (for example)?
 
The [http://creativecommons.org Creative Commons] (concerned with free culture) offers a range of licenses whose degrees of freedom vary, and there is a compatibility gap when we consider freedom to mix (key to free culture).
 
Derek Keats once explained this to me as follows:
 
Here are some CC licenses with most restrictive on the left, least restrictive on the right:
 
(C)----[BY-ND----NC----BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD]
 
Now imagine over this continuum above a skewed distribution "degree of freedom" peaking at "BY-SA".
 
For mixing content there is a compatibility gap:
 
(C)----[BY-ND----NC--|COMPATIBILITY GAP|--BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD].
 
Copyleft contributes a lot to the free culture goal.
 
Regarding free software we find [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software].
[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#PublicDomainSoftware Public domain software] is [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] - "some copies or modified versions may not be free at all".
 
For culture it seems to make sense to have a continuum of Creative Commons licenses.
 
For software we have [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#FreeSoftware free] and [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#non-freeSoftware non-free] software and permit [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] while preferring [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#CopyleftedSoftware CopyleftedSoftware] as it supports the goal of giving ''every'' user (now and in future) the freedoms implied by the term "free software".
 
Again, copyleft contributes much to the cause.
 
<small>(Though rms has recently confirmed that the free software definition does not (and ''should not'') ''require'' copyleft). </small>
 
For free knowledge, the intent is for the knowledge to be free/libre - that the users are free to re-use, build upon and share (alike?) any knowledge they gain from a knowledge resource. Public Domain and Attribution allow the next user to lock up the knowledge in a restrictive derived work.
 
Is there a case to elevate the status of copyleft? Is copyleft only needed on account of the inappropriate status of copyright in the networked world of blogging, wikis,  ... - the global copy/mix/share read-write culture (where the role of publishers is not so crucial for knowledge dissemination)?
We need to protect and enhance the flow of resources into the commons.
 
[[User:Ktucker|Kim]] 12:03, 12 March 2007 (CET)
 
 
== Blog about freedom and intellectual properties issues ==
I've started a blog about some of this stuff
 
http://stealingfromthedrawer.blogspot.com/
 
I'm not making money off this or anything, I'm just interested. I'd appreciate feedback either here or on the blog as to what you think of the points I'm bringing up. --[[User:Nerd42|Nerd42]] 20:57, 25 October 2007 (CEST)

Action parameters

VariableValue
Name of the user account (user_name)
'5.189.182.40'
Age of the user account (user_age)
0
Page ID (page_id)
4573
Page namespace (page_namespace)
0
Page title (without namespace) (page_title)
'Discussion of copyleft'
Full page title (page_prefixedtitle)
'Discussion of copyleft'
Action (action)
'edit'
Edit summary/reason (summary)
'This is a super great blog and is exactly what I am searching around for'
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (no longer in use) (minor_edit)
false
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
'Are there differences between free software, free culture and free knowledge? We seem to be basing the definitions on free software - but is there a point where the analogy does not quite hold? Or where we might need to take a stronger stand on copyleft (for example)? The [http://creativecommons.org Creative Commons] (concerned with free culture) offers a range of licenses whose degrees of freedom vary, and there is a compatibility gap when we consider freedom to mix (key to free culture). Derek Keats once explained this to me as follows: Here are some CC licenses with most restrictive on the left, least restrictive on the right: (C)----[BY-ND----NC----BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD] Now imagine over this continuum above a skewed distribution "degree of freedom" peaking at "BY-SA". For mixing content there is a compatibility gap: (C)----[BY-ND----NC--|COMPATIBILITY GAP|--BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD]. Copyleft contributes a lot to the free culture goal. Regarding free software we find [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software]. [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#PublicDomainSoftware Public domain software] is [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] - "some copies or modified versions may not be free at all". For culture it seems to make sense to have a continuum of Creative Commons licenses. For software we have [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#FreeSoftware free] and [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#non-freeSoftware non-free] software and permit [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] while preferring [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#CopyleftedSoftware CopyleftedSoftware] as it supports the goal of giving ''every'' user (now and in future) the freedoms implied by the term "free software". Again, copyleft contributes much to the cause. <small>(Though rms has recently confirmed that the free software definition does not (and ''should not'') ''require'' copyleft). </small> For free knowledge, the intent is for the knowledge to be free/libre - that the users are free to re-use, build upon and share (alike?) any knowledge they gain from a knowledge resource. Public Domain and Attribution allow the next user to lock up the knowledge in a restrictive derived work. Is there a case to elevate the status of copyleft? Is copyleft only needed on account of the inappropriate status of copyright in the networked world of blogging, wikis, ... - the global copy/mix/share read-write culture (where the role of publishers is not so crucial for knowledge dissemination)? We need to protect and enhance the flow of resources into the commons. [[User:Ktucker|Kim]] 12:03, 12 March 2007 (CET) == Blog about freedom and intellectual properties issues == I've started a blog about some of this stuff http://stealingfromthedrawer.blogspot.com/ I'm not making money off this or anything, I'm just interested. I'd appreciate feedback either here or on the blog as to what you think of the points I'm bringing up. --[[User:Nerd42|Nerd42]] 20:57, 25 October 2007 (CEST)'
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
'This is a very fantastic web design and is what I'm looking for. It has a lot of different kinds of knowledge I am forever trying to learn extra information concerning it. Thanks for making the site you have done a great job and I am sure lots of users will enjoy the site as well. I am an <a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com/index-3.html>seo company colorado</a> and also see that you've done an excellent job in the area too and if you need any extra with the seo send me a pm and I will give you a few pointers. If you need <a href=http://www.flageliteclean.com>carpet cleaning flagstaff</a>, my sister has a good service set up in FLagstaff Arizona, you can learn more info about it here.<a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com>best seo companies in phoenix"</a>|<a href="http://www.flageliteclean.com">house cleaning and cleaner services in flagstaff az</a>'
Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff)
'@@ -1,44 +1 @@ -Are there differences between free software, free culture and free knowledge? -We seem to be basing the definitions on free software - but is there a point where the analogy does not quite hold? Or where we might need to take a stronger stand on copyleft (for example)? - -The [http://creativecommons.org Creative Commons] (concerned with free culture) offers a range of licenses whose degrees of freedom vary, and there is a compatibility gap when we consider freedom to mix (key to free culture). - -Derek Keats once explained this to me as follows: - -Here are some CC licenses with most restrictive on the left, least restrictive on the right: - -(C)----[BY-ND----NC----BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD] - -Now imagine over this continuum above a skewed distribution "degree of freedom" peaking at "BY-SA". - -For mixing content there is a compatibility gap: - -(C)----[BY-ND----NC--|COMPATIBILITY GAP|--BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD]. - -Copyleft contributes a lot to the free culture goal. - -Regarding free software we find [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software]. -[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#PublicDomainSoftware Public domain software] is [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] - "some copies or modified versions may not be free at all". - -For culture it seems to make sense to have a continuum of Creative Commons licenses. - -For software we have [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#FreeSoftware free] and [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#non-freeSoftware non-free] software and permit [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] while preferring [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#CopyleftedSoftware CopyleftedSoftware] as it supports the goal of giving ''every'' user (now and in future) the freedoms implied by the term "free software". - -Again, copyleft contributes much to the cause. - -<small>(Though rms has recently confirmed that the free software definition does not (and ''should not'') ''require'' copyleft). </small> - -For free knowledge, the intent is for the knowledge to be free/libre - that the users are free to re-use, build upon and share (alike?) any knowledge they gain from a knowledge resource. Public Domain and Attribution allow the next user to lock up the knowledge in a restrictive derived work. - -Is there a case to elevate the status of copyleft? Is copyleft only needed on account of the inappropriate status of copyright in the networked world of blogging, wikis, ... - the global copy/mix/share read-write culture (where the role of publishers is not so crucial for knowledge dissemination)? -We need to protect and enhance the flow of resources into the commons. - -[[User:Ktucker|Kim]] 12:03, 12 March 2007 (CET) - - -== Blog about freedom and intellectual properties issues == -I've started a blog about some of this stuff - -http://stealingfromthedrawer.blogspot.com/ - -I'm not making money off this or anything, I'm just interested. I'd appreciate feedback either here or on the blog as to what you think of the points I'm bringing up. --[[User:Nerd42|Nerd42]] 20:57, 25 October 2007 (CEST) +This is a very fantastic web design and is what I'm looking for. It has a lot of different kinds of knowledge I am forever trying to learn extra information concerning it. Thanks for making the site you have done a great job and I am sure lots of users will enjoy the site as well. I am an <a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com/index-3.html>seo company colorado</a> and also see that you've done an excellent job in the area too and if you need any extra with the seo send me a pm and I will give you a few pointers. If you need <a href=http://www.flageliteclean.com>carpet cleaning flagstaff</a>, my sister has a good service set up in FLagstaff Arizona, you can learn more info about it here.<a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com>best seo companies in phoenix"</a>|<a href="http://www.flageliteclean.com">house cleaning and cleaner services in flagstaff az</a> '
Old page size (old_size)
3332
Lines added in edit (added_lines)
[ 0 => 'This is a very fantastic web design and is what I'm looking for. It has a lot of different kinds of knowledge I am forever trying to learn extra information concerning it. Thanks for making the site you have done a great job and I am sure lots of users will enjoy the site as well. I am an <a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com/index-3.html>seo company colorado</a> and also see that you've done an excellent job in the area too and if you need any extra with the seo send me a pm and I will give you a few pointers. If you need <a href=http://www.flageliteclean.com>carpet cleaning flagstaff</a>, my sister has a good service set up in FLagstaff Arizona, you can learn more info about it here.<a href=http://www.gotwebsite1.com>best seo companies in phoenix"</a>|<a href="http://www.flageliteclean.com">house cleaning and cleaner services in flagstaff az</a>' ]
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1481268741