Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Editing Talk:The non-commercial provision obfuscates intent

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 9: Line 9:
:: [[user:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] has made a similar, valid point, that the existence of a substantial grey area does not make a distinction worthless; if there are uses that are clearly "commercial" and thereby disallowed, or uses that are clearly "non-commercial" and thereby allowed, then the license can serve a purpose. IMO this is a valid perspective; in the non-grey areas, one would need to consult the more nuanced arguments at [[Licenses/NC]] to make a decision.
:: [[user:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] has made a similar, valid point, that the existence of a substantial grey area does not make a distinction worthless; if there are uses that are clearly "commercial" and thereby disallowed, or uses that are clearly "non-commercial" and thereby allowed, then the license can serve a purpose. IMO this is a valid perspective; in the non-grey areas, one would need to consult the more nuanced arguments at [[Licenses/NC]] to make a decision.
:: I'd be interested to hear a well-informed and well-argued recommendation of the NC provision from somebody who has observed it leading to beneficial results. If you come across any, I'd appreciate a link. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 21:43, 9 July 2020 (CEST)
:: I'd be interested to hear a well-informed and well-argued recommendation of the NC provision from somebody who has observed it leading to beneficial results. If you come across any, I'd appreciate a link. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 21:43, 9 July 2020 (CEST)
:::I agree with you so I've never found any convincing defense of NC... But maybe someone has written something good before the release of 4.0, when [https://creativecommons.org/2012/08/29/ongoing-discussions-noncommercial-and-noderivatives/ people asked to abolish NC/ND]. [[User:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[User talk:Nemo bis|talk]]) 18:11, 12 July 2020 (CEST)
Please note that all contributions to Definition of Free Cultural Works are considered to be released under the Attribution 2.5 (see Definition of Free Cultural Works:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)