Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Talk:Source Code: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Transitivity) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page is really a draft! Perhaps we will need it, perhaps not ;-) | This page is really a draft! Perhaps we will need it, perhaps not ;-) | ||
--[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 05:33, 15 May 2006 (CEST) | --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 05:33, 15 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
== Transitivity == | |||
:Quote: ''Of course, the source code must satisfy to the freedoms of free content as well. Therefore, by recursivity, our definition is not weaker than the one in the GNU GPL.'' | |||
I would note that the definition here for soure code ("symbolic modifiable form") is incompatible with the simper, FSF definition ("the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it"[http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html]). Source code forms allowed by the GPL might not be similarly allowed by the above definition if, for example, they do not include "symbolic" information. --[[User:Rgladwell|Ricardo Gladwell]] 11:16, 15 May 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 11:16, 15 May 2006
This page is really a draft! Perhaps we will need it, perhaps not ;-) --Antoine 05:33, 15 May 2006 (CEST)
Transitivity
- Quote: Of course, the source code must satisfy to the freedoms of free content as well. Therefore, by recursivity, our definition is not weaker than the one in the GNU GPL.
I would note that the definition here for soure code ("symbolic modifiable form") is incompatible with the simper, FSF definition ("the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it"[1]). Source code forms allowed by the GPL might not be similarly allowed by the above definition if, for example, they do not include "symbolic" information. --Ricardo Gladwell 11:16, 15 May 2006 (CEST)