Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Editing Talk:Logo contest

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 6: Line 6:
:: Ok, I understand. I will modify that image. --[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 12:18, 21 May 2006 (CEST)
:: Ok, I understand. I will modify that image. --[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 12:18, 21 May 2006 (CEST)
:::Erik, what about this? [[Image:FC10.png|75px]] --[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 16:48, 21 May 2006 (CEST)
:::Erik, what about this? [[Image:FC3.png|75px]] --[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 16:48, 21 May 2006 (CEST)
:::: Interesting - nice pastel colors, but will that approach work in grayscale? I might prefer the "petals" to flow into each other, using transparency and perhaps turning off the gray border. I have to admit I don't like the bounding box very much in this version. The black lines on the lower left look like a barcode, making the whole picture look a bit like a package ready to be sold. Perhaps try some radical variations here (circles instead of rectangles etc.)? I think the logo still would need a certain whoomp, something to make it stand out -- perspective perhaps, or color (the fact that you use pastels would let some high saturaton color stand out).--[[User:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] 00:55, 22 May 2006 (CEST)
:::::A logo must be simple, because you see a little logo: I'll think to a more simple logo. --[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 01:22, 22 May 2006 (CEST)
You can see well this logo also when it's little. [[Image:Free.png|75px]]--[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 22:06, 22 May 2006 (CEST)
: Nice, just a tad sharp -- can it be made to look less aggressive?--[[User:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] 22:54, 22 May 2006 (CEST)
::: Hmm, interesting. Evokes toy/circus connotations for me. Would need to see a couple of variations to know if this is the right way to go. I think the colored blades should be a bit smaller, perhaps, and shades of the same color.--[[User:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (CEST)
:::: [[Image:Free3.png|75px]] [[Image:Freex.png|75px]]--[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 10:31, 23 May 2006 (CEST)
New type. [[Image:glob.png|75px]] --[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 10:58, 23 May 2006 (CEST)
Excuse me, but what exactly do you mean by "This logo is not original." ? --[[User:Mfalzon|Mfalzon]] 21:43, 26 July 2006 (CEST)
:It was added by an unregistered user. I've asked them at [[User talk:]] what they meant. [[User:Angela Beesley|Angela Beesley]] 19:45, 26 July 2006 (CEST)
::I hate to seem assuming bad faith, but this smells like FUD on the part of --[[User:Lemi4|Lemi4]] 15:54, 15 September 2006 (CEST)
Any comments on variations in other languages? - perhaps avoid text in the logos/emblems, or allow alternative text within them? - e.g. in Chinese: 自由, Spanish, Italian, Arabic, French, Finnish, Swedish, German, kiSwahili, Zulu, Amaric, ... ?

Please note that all contributions to Definition of Free Cultural Works are considered to be released under the Attribution 2.5 (see Definition of Free Cultural Works:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)