Talk:Licenses/NC: Revision history

9 July 2020

• curprev 00:5000:50, 9 July 2020‎ Peteforsyth talk contribs‎ 6,881 bytes +989‎ →‎New essay: The non-commercial provision obfuscates intent: new section undo

10 March 2016

• curprev 18:4918:49, 10 March 2016‎ 167.57.124.9 talk‎ 5,892 bytes +264‎ →‎For-profit platforms: new section undo

6 October 2014

• curprev 09:2009:20, 6 October 2014‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ m 5,628 bytes −2‎ Reverted edits by 208.54.4.188 (talk) to last revision by Mormegil undo
• curprev 04:4104:41, 6 October 2014‎ 208.54.4.188 talk‎ 5,630 bytes +2‎ →‎"freedom" undo

29 September 2014

• curprev 18:0318:03, 29 September 2014‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ 5,628 bytes +707‎ →‎"freedom": re undo

26 September 2014

• curprev 08:5008:50, 26 September 2014‎ Freedum talk contribs‎ 4,921 bytes +1,671‎ →‎"freedom": new section undo

17 September 2014

• curprev 08:2908:29, 17 September 2014‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ 3,250 bytes +268‎ →‎Copyright duration: No. Well, at least not in the countries I am familiar with. undo

16 September 2014

• curprev 21:3621:36, 16 September 2014‎ Calinou talk contribs‎ 2,982 bytes −38,824‎ Archive the old page. undo
• curprev 21:3121:31, 16 September 2014‎ Calinou talk contribs‎ 41,806 bytes +303‎ No edit summary undo

5 September 2014

• curprev 17:1317:13, 5 September 2014‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ 41,503 bytes +115‎ →‎Missing references to court cases?: Nice finds! Thank you! --~~~~ undo
• curprev 16:3516:35, 5 September 2014‎ 163.1.84.1 talk‎ 41,388 bytes +486‎ →‎Missing references to court cases?: new section undo

29 July 2014

• curprev 10:4310:43, 29 July 2014‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ m 40,902 bytes −56‎ move current talk to bottom, fmt undo

28 July 2014

• curprev 23:4123:41, 28 July 2014‎ Wolftune talk contribs‎ 40,958 bytes +986‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 23:1323:13, 28 July 2014‎ 79.173.34.212 talk‎ 39,972 bytes +1,064‎ No edit summary undo

16 April 2012

• curprev 17:5517:55, 16 April 2012‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ 38,908 bytes +274‎ →‎Considering some edits: Just to point out, CC 4 is considering including some kind of NC explanation/definition (but they have not decided yet, whether to include it or not), see e.g. [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/32157] --~~~~ undo
• curprev 07:4107:41, 16 April 2012‎ Peteforsyth talk contribs‎ 38,634 bytes +1,579‎ Considering some changes undo

6 April 2012

• curprev 13:2413:24, 6 April 2012‎ Mormegil talk contribs‎ 37,055 bytes +311‎ →‎Is Non-commercial enforceable?: That is exactly one of the biggest problem of NC licenses. See also Defining “Noncommercial”: A Study of How the Online Population Understands “Noncommercial Use” by Creative Commons. undo

4 April 2012

• curprev 21:1521:15, 4 April 2012‎ 98.233.70.55 talk‎ 36,744 bytes +1,404‎ Is NC enforceable? undo

31 October 2011

• curprev 20:4820:48, 31 October 2011‎ Benjamin Mako Hill talk contribs‎ 35,340 bytes +2,683‎ revert spam undo

29 October 2011

• curprev 12:1612:16, 29 October 2011‎ 76.97.179.228 talk‎ 32,657 bytes −1,035‎ →‎What about NC and SA together? undo