Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Talk:Existing Movements: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
--[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 23:06, 24 May 2006 (CEST) | --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 23:06, 24 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
Although the IETF RFC documents are not completely free (allowance of [http://www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html#derivs derivative works] is only required in the scope of the standard drafting process itself), I think it can work as a good example of essential freedoms applied to scientific/technical cooperation. What do you think? --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 01:24, 14 June 2006 (CEST) | Although the IETF RFC documents are not completely free (allowance of [http://www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html#derivs derivative works] is only required in the scope of the standard drafting process itself), I think it can work as a good example of essential freedoms applied to scientific/technical cooperation. | ||
If other movements use the complete set of essential freedoms for similar purposes, we can replace the IETF with those movements. What do you think? --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 01:24, 14 June 2006 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 01:25, 14 June 2006
Hi,
I suppose it will be useful to make a concise introduction to the existing movements centered around Free Contents/Free X.
--Antoine 23:06, 24 May 2006 (CEST)
Although the IETF RFC documents are not completely free (allowance of derivative works is only required in the scope of the standard drafting process itself), I think it can work as a good example of essential freedoms applied to scientific/technical cooperation.
If other movements use the complete set of essential freedoms for similar purposes, we can replace the IETF with those movements. What do you think? --Antoine 01:24, 14 June 2006 (CEST)