Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...ggest to send a questionnarie to the organizations that have published the licenses. Antoine is the principal developer of the grid and he doesn't know well the licenses that he values.--[[User:Bob4|Bob4]] 22:15, 26 May 2006 (CEST)
    71 KB (11,307 words) - 08:06, 30 April 2021
  • If a license has a clause about the applicable law, is the license free? : I think CC are working on licenses covered by Berne/WIPO law only. But a license needs a jurisdiction to avoid
    55 KB (9,150 words) - 20:02, 29 June 2023
  • ...?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=Licenses%2F&namespace=0 Prefix Index: "Licenses"]</div> == Comparison of Licenses ==
    20 KB (2,910 words) - 08:15, 11 July 2023
  • ...es/NC/Hr|Hrvatski (Croatian)]] - [[Licenses/NC/Nl|Nederlands (Dutch)]] - [[Licenses/NC/Pt|Português (Portuguese)]] * Requested translations: [[Licenses/NC/Ja|日本語 (Japanese)]] - [[Licenses/NC/El|Ελληνικά (Greek)]]
    34 KB (5,397 words) - 16:04, 15 December 2023
  • ...Software Definition; there is also an Open Source Definition; there is no "Free Software and Open Source Definition". Settling on a single term sends a cle (I personally find "Free Content" and "Free Creation" are the two best choices, but it doesn't really matter; what matt
    25 KB (4,348 words) - 14:02, 7 July 2006
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free." ...e graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be '''free''', and by ''freedom'' we mean:
    20 KB (2,982 words) - 19:09, 16 July 2011
  • ...ree content, and that non-free content, where it is useful, should be made free to the largest extent possible. To create subpages e.g. for philosophy or o ..., while some of us my share the CC's aims, not all of us would support its licenses. There is also the problem that content I submit here goes under the CC whi
    14 KB (2,266 words) - 13:14, 24 January 2024
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free." ...avat edellämainittuja vapauksia. Määritelmä erottaa ''vapaat teokset'' ''[[licenses|vapaista lisensseistä]]'', joita voidaan käyttää suojaamaan vapaan teok
    20 KB (3,041 words) - 10:36, 3 May 2024
  • ...grundvallarfrelsi. Skilgreiningin skilur á milli ''frjálsra verka'' og ''[[licenses|frjálsra afnotaleyfa]]'' sem má nota til þess að tryggja réttarstöðu ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free."
    19 KB (3,246 words) - 01:01, 24 January 2013
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free."
    21 KB (1,558 words) - 17:06, 21 April 2020
  • '''[[Talk:Licenses/NC|Current talk page]]''' I quite agree with your conclusions. I'm trying to put together a CD with free music to be sold at a nominal fee in order to cover production, and I can't
    38 KB (6,374 words) - 14:46, 2 September 2020
  • ...asar. Definisi ini membedakan secara jelas antara ''karya bebas'', dan ''[[licenses|lisensi bebas]]'' yang dapat digunakan untuk memproteksi secara legal statu ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free."
    13 KB (1,986 words) - 08:55, 29 October 2020
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free." ...e graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be '''free''', and by ''freedom'' we mean:
    9 KB (1,535 words) - 23:09, 15 December 2008
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free." ...e graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be '''free''', and by ''freedom'' we mean:
    9 KB (1,443 words) - 18:57, 17 February 2015
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free." ...e graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be '''free''', and by ''freedom'' we mean:
    9 KB (1,446 words) - 10:54, 10 May 2021
  • ...it is a tool to determine whether a work or license should be considered "free." ...e graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be '''free''', and by ''freedom'' we mean:
    11 KB (1,713 words) - 21:12, 2 November 2009
  • ...sential freedoms. Additionally, the document provides a [[Licenses|list of licenses]] which meet the terms of freedom laid out in this definition. ...it from being used freely. We therefore believe that these works should be free, and by "freedom" we mean:
    10 KB (1,583 words) - 10:35, 3 May 2024
  • ...efinition originates at Wikipedia/Wikimedia Foundation, which use copyleft licenses extensively (the whole body of Wikipedia text is licensed under CC-BY-SA, f ...an include CC-BY-SA or LGPL works as part of works distributed under other licenses, but you cannot do the same thing with GPL and GFDL works. This is also why
    13 KB (2,152 words) - 10:35, 4 August 2022
  • == Is there really a need for this? We already have so many licenses. == ..., no such definition existed for free content (two definitions existed for free software).
    10 KB (1,613 words) - 08:15, 11 July 2023
  • ...e graceful functioning of this ecosystem, works of authorship should be '''free''', and by ''freedom'' we mean: ...nts known as licenses. For an author, choosing to put their work under a ''free license'' does not mean that they lose all their rights, but it gives to an
    9 KB (1,507 words) - 02:00, 9 January 2015

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)