Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Difference between revisions of "Source Code"

From Definition of Free Cultural Works
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
Therefore, by recursion, our definition is not weaker than the one in the GNU GPL
 
Therefore, by recursion, our definition is not weaker than the one in the GNU GPL
  
==Examples==
+
Kewl you sholud come up with that. Excellent!
 
 
* software source code
 
* editable text (raw text, XML, word processor files...)
 
* vector graphics files
 
* tablatures, lyrics
 
* multitracks from an audio recording
 
* ...
 

Revision as of 04:58, 2 May 2011

That's 2 cevler by half and 2x2 clever 4 me. Thanks!

Discussion of terms

  • structured: which gives access to the structure of the work (for example, an OpenDocument file gives access to the structure of the document, whereas a PDF file doesn't)
  • modifiable: whose format allows easy modification (including modification of structure)
  • computation: which does not involve any creative act from a human being

Transitivity

Of course, the source code must satisfy the freedoms of free content as well. Therefore, by recursion, our definition is not weaker than the one in the GNU GPL

Kewl you sholud come up with that. Excellent!