Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Moderators: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (37 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* In extreme cases, as a group, they can veto certain changes that are counter to the philosophy of this definition, even if a majority of people are in favor of them. | * In extreme cases, as a group, they can veto certain changes that are counter to the philosophy of this definition, even if a majority of people are in favor of them. | ||
== Current moderators == | |||
* [[User:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] | * [[User:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]] | ||
| Line 20: | Line 12: | ||
* [[User:Mia Garlick|Mia Garlick]] | * [[User:Mia Garlick|Mia Garlick]] | ||
* [[User:Elizabeth stark|Elizabeth Stark]] | * [[User:Elizabeth stark|Elizabeth Stark]] | ||
* [[User:Koavf|Justin Anthony Knapp (koavf)]] | |||
* [[User:Mormegil|Petr Kadlec]] | |||
Revision as of 05:36, 9 June 2015
The initial moderators of this site were hand-picked by the initiator of the definition, Erik Möller. Each moderator has the right to suggest new moderators to the group, who are approved in consensus. The group of moderators is intended to be small, and to share the principal goals with which this definition was started.
The moderators have two key privileges:
- They can decide when a consensus (directly or by means of a vote) has been reached about a change to the unstable version of the definition, and apply it to the stable version. (If there is a dispute among the moderators, it is considered to be a sign of no consensus.)
- In extreme cases, as a group, they can veto certain changes that are counter to the philosophy of this definition, even if a majority of people are in favor of them.