Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Licenses: Difference between revisions

From Definition of Free Cultural Works
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(invariant sections are not "free")
(IANG is controversial)
Line 10: Line 10:
To be verified:
To be verified:
* [http://www.wikiweise.de/wiki/Wikiweise%3AFreie%20Wiki-Lizenz Freie Wiki-Lizenz]
* [http://www.wikiweise.de/wiki/Wikiweise%3AFreie%20Wiki-Lizenz Freie Wiki-Lizenz]
* [http://iang.info/en IANG license]


Controversial:
Controversial:
* [http://www.freecreations.org/Against_DRM.html Against DRM license] - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license.
* [http://www.freecreations.org/Against_DRM.html Against DRM license] - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license.
* [http://iang.info/en IANG license] - seeks to enforce lots of things that are outside of the copyright realm (like organization scheme, rights of users to have a voice in the development process, etc.)

Revision as of 18:05, 1 May 2006

Tentatively, the following licenses are known to meet the criteria set out by the definition:

In addition, works in the public domain are also free content as per the definition.

To be verified:

Controversial:

  • Against DRM license - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license.
  • IANG license - seeks to enforce lots of things that are outside of the copyright realm (like organization scheme, rights of users to have a voice in the development process, etc.)