Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Editing Free Service Definition

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
=Summary=
The core idea is to protect users' freedom when they use services (gmail, flickr, todocue, etc) — to standardize Terms of Service/Privacy Policies so users know how a service will respect their freedom, privacy, and data.
The core idea of the Free Service Definition (FSD) is to protect users' freedom when they use services (eg gmail, flickr, todocue, mugshot) — to standardize Terms of Service/Privacy Policies so users know how a service will respect their freedom, privacy, and data.  Having a standardized FSD would make the decision to become a freedom-respecting service provider simpler and less risky.  We are in the process of defining what a Free Service is.


=Defining Free Services=
Please put comments on each requirement immediately beneath it, and include your signature.
Please help us by [[Talk:Free_Service_Definition|commenting]] on the following requirements and by [[Talk:Free_Service_Definition|suggesting new ones]] on the Talk page.
 
'''0. Uses all Free Software'''


'''1. Uses free/standard data formats if possible'''
'''1. Uses free/standard data formats if possible'''


'''2. Provides trivial and costless data export for backup/transferability'''
'''2. Provides trivial and costless data export for backup/transferability'''
* Published and documented API: The idea being that a good service providing all the data in exportable feeds is good, but full exports should be rare, whereas a query-able API, be it REST or some RPC variant is much more generically friendly for users/mashups (in addition to usually saving both bandwidth and time for the service and its users as opposed to full exports).


'''3. Keeps information private except with explicit permission.'''
'''3. Keeps information private except with explicit permission.'''
* Related to the privacy clause, what about with respect to governments? Obviously, it couldn't require a company to violate the law, but it could require that giving data to a government has to be "involuntary", ie. they would be breaking the law if they didn't. -- Joseph


'''4. Deletes all of user's records within N hours/days of closing account'''
'''4. Deletes all of user's records within N hours/days of closing account'''
Line 23: Line 19:
'''7. Protects trademark/naming rights of provider'''
'''7. Protects trademark/naming rights of provider'''


'''8. Does not give/allow access to user data to non-FSD services (eg advertisers, statistics, etc)'''
Perhaps two versions, a FSL and LFSL, could exist, with the LFSL not containing requirement 0.


=Ideas for the Future=
Having a standardized FSL would make the decision to become a freedom-respecting service provider simpler and less risky.


Given a critical mass of FSD-compliant services or at least mindshare, we might even see FSD versions of Google AdSense, Analytics etc.
Naturally, one requirement of FSL services would be that they do not incorporate/contain non-FSL services (like many third-party advertising or statistics providers). Given a critical mass of FSL services or at least mindshare, we might even see FSL versions of Google AdSense, Analytics etc.


=Related Links/Resources=
Related Links/Resources
The Affero GPL is GPL plus a requirement that service providers must provide source of modified network applications, even if there isn't a transfer of code in the normal desktop-application sense. I am not releasing TodoCue as open source until I figure out what makes more sense: the AGPL, or a different license that goes beyond AGPL, requiring any services that use it to be under the FSD.
The Affero GPL is GPL plus a requirement that service providers must provide source of modified network applications, even if there isn't a transfer of code in the normal desktop-application sense. I am not releasing TodoCue as open source until I figure out what makes more sense: the AGPL, or a different license that goes beyond AGPL, requiring any services that use it to be under the FSL.


OSCON, coming up on July 24th, includes Eben Moglen talking about Licensing in the Web 2.0 Era and Tim O'Reilly talking about The Cathedral AND the Bazaar and the "six axes of open source".
OSCON, coming up on July 24th, includes Eben Moglen talking about Licensing in the Web 2.0 Era and Tim O'Reilly talking about The Cathedral AND the Bazaar and the "six axes of open source".
Please note that all contributions to Definition of Free Cultural Works are considered to be released under the Attribution 2.5 (see Definition of Free Cultural Works:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)
Retrieved from "https://freedomdefined.org/Free_Service_Definition"