Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Editing Discussion of copyleft

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
Are there differences between free software, free culture and free knowledge?
You should grasp the artwork and technology of traffic on your website. Is the website online without site visitors is like having an ice cream keep within the wasteland, positioned 100 km from the closest highway. It has the most productive ice cream on the planet, but if anyone enters your store, you'll be defeated.
We seem to be basing the definitions on free software - but is there a point where the analogy does not quite hold? Or where we might need to take a stronger stand on copyleft (for example)?
 
The [http://creativecommons.org Creative Commons] (concerned with free culture) offers a range of licenses whose degrees of freedom vary, and there is a compatibility gap when we consider freedom to mix (key to free culture).
 
Derek Keats once explained this to me as follows:
 
Here are some CC licenses with most restrictive on the left, least restrictive on the right:
 
(C)----[BY-ND----NC----BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD]
 
Now imagine over this continuum above a skewed distribution "degree of freedom" peaking at "BY-SA".
 
For mixing content there is a compatibility gap:
 
(C)----[BY-ND----NC--|COMPATIBILITY GAP|--BY-SA----BY]----[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ PD].
 
Copyleft contributes a lot to the free culture goal.
 
Regarding free software we find [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software].
[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#PublicDomainSoftware Public domain software] is [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] - "some copies or modified versions may not be free at all".
 
For culture it seems to make sense to have a continuum of Creative Commons licenses.
 
For software we have [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#FreeSoftware free] and [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#non-freeSoftware non-free] software and permit [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#Non-CopyleftedFreeSoftware non-copylefted free software] while preferring [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html#CopyleftedSoftware CopyleftedSoftware] as it supports the goal of giving ''every'' user (now and in future) the freedoms implied by the term "free software".
 
Again, copyleft contributes much to the cause.
 
<small>(Though rms has recently confirmed that the free software definition does not (and ''should not'') ''require'' copyleft). </small>
 
For free knowledge, the intent is for the knowledge to be free/libre - that the users are free to re-use, build upon and share (alike?) any knowledge they gain from a knowledge resource. Public Domain and Attribution allow the next user to lock up the knowledge in a restrictive derived work.
 
Is there a case to elevate the status of copyleft? Is copyleft only needed on account of the inappropriate status of copyright in the networked world of blogging, wikis,  ... - the global copy/mix/share read-write culture (where the role of publishers is not so crucial for knowledge dissemination)?
We need to protect and enhance the flow of resources into the commons.
 
[[User:Ktucker|Kim]] 12:03, 12 March 2007 (CET)
 
 
== Blog about freedom and intellectual properties issues ==
I've started a blog about some of this stuff
 
http://stealingfromthedrawer.blogspot.com/
 
I'm not making money off this or anything, I'm just interested. I'd appreciate feedback either here or on the blog as to what you think of the points I'm bringing up. --[[User:Nerd42|Nerd42]] 20:57, 25 October 2007 (CEST)
Please note that all contributions to Definition of Free Cultural Works are considered to be released under the Attribution 2.5 (see Definition of Free Cultural Works:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)