Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
User:Habj: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Richard Stallman believes all software should be free. Linus Thorvalds thinks it is fine that some software is free, but not necessarily that all software should be free. | Richard Stallman believes all software should be free. Linus Thorvalds thinks it is fine that some software is free, but not necessarily that all software should be free. | ||
This project has developed in directions I don't like. From the start, it was obvious that the Free Software Foundation was somewhat of a model, but the Definition has grown more extreme in this sense. The way the definition stands now, you can hardly be active on this website and then publish a book in a regular publishing house, the "common" way. So I'm | This project has developed in directions I don't like. From the start, it was obvious that the Free Software Foundation was somewhat of a model, but the Definition has grown more extreme in this sense. The way the definition stands now, you can hardly be active on this website and then publish a book in a regular publishing house, the "common" way. So I'm of | ||
Revision as of 01:54, 9 October 2011
Richard Stallman believes all software should be free. Linus Thorvalds thinks it is fine that some software is free, but not necessarily that all software should be free.
This project has developed in directions I don't like. From the start, it was obvious that the Free Software Foundation was somewhat of a model, but the Definition has grown more extreme in this sense. The way the definition stands now, you can hardly be active on this website and then publish a book in a regular publishing house, the "common" way. So I'm of