Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Licenses/NC/Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Open University) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Possibly study recent switch by CK12 to NC license | * Possibly study recent switch by CK12 to NC license | ||
* Point out some of the internal conflicts in the WP community about the issue, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-05-31/Photography | * Point out some of the internal conflicts in the WP community about the issue, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-05-31/Photography | ||
Revision as of 03:06, 21 January 2011
Notes for next version:
- More recent commercial uses of Wikipedia: WikiReader, Bing/Powerset, Freebase, WikiPock, iPad/iPhone apps, PediaPress, etc.
- Commercial use as innovation driver
- Recap CBC incident
- Even public benefit organizations often have commercial or borderline use cases they need to consider
- NC license here triggered even avoidance of CC in general!
- Brief recap of ND license and its unintended consequences, give example of ND use by FSF
- Reference http://robmyers.org/weblog/2008/07/the-emerging-nc-consensus.html and related writingsiki
- Incorporate findings from CC's NC study -- "there is more uncertainty than clarity around whether specific uses of online content are commercial or noncommercial", http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Defining_Noncommercial
- Review http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing/Justifications and http://www.appropedia.org/Non-commercial_licenses_vs_free_licenses to see if anything is worth incorporating here
- Possibly study recent switch by CK12 to NC license
- Point out some of the internal conflicts in the WP community about the issue, e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-05-31/Photography