Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Talk:Permissible restrictions: Difference between revisions
(New page: == Small bug == There is a bug here. One of the sentences says ''"The license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work, notably by enforcing some of ...) |
TeunSpaans (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
There is a bug here. One of the sentences says ''"The license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work, notably by enforcing some of the conditions specified in the paragraphs below"'', but the meaning of "the paragraphs below" has been lost when this part of this definition was given its own page. | There is a bug here. One of the sentences says ''"The license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work, notably by enforcing some of the conditions specified in the paragraphs below"'', but the meaning of "the paragraphs below" has been lost when this part of this definition was given its own page. | ||
--[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 15:37, 18 February 2007 (CET) | --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 15:37, 18 February 2007 (CET) | ||
== question == | |||
A question on "Permissible restrictions": if a photo would have a restriction that the ''location'' where it was taken has to be mentioned, would that constitute an unpermissible restriction? Example: Mention ''Taken at London zoo'' on publication. [[User:TeunSpaans|TeunSpaans]] 15:34, 27 March 2007 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 13:34, 27 March 2007
Small bug
There is a bug here. One of the sentences says "The license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work, notably by enforcing some of the conditions specified in the paragraphs below", but the meaning of "the paragraphs below" has been lost when this part of this definition was given its own page. --Antoine 15:37, 18 February 2007 (CET)
question
A question on "Permissible restrictions": if a photo would have a restriction that the location where it was taken has to be mentioned, would that constitute an unpermissible restriction? Example: Mention Taken at London zoo on publication. TeunSpaans 15:34, 27 March 2007 (CEST)