Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Licenses: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License] when no invariant sections are specified (this is important) | * [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License] when no invariant sections are specified (this is important) | ||
* [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License] (not free for Debian) | * [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License] (not free for Debian) | ||
* [http://www.freecreations.org/Against_DRM2.html Against DRM 2.0] | |||
* All [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html free software licenses]. While many of them are specific to software, some are worded so as to apply to all kinds of digital works. For example, the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL] is often applied to non-software works (such as computer graphics, game scenarios...). | * All [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html free software licenses]. While many of them are specific to software, some are worded so as to apply to all kinds of digital works. For example, the [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html GNU GPL] is often applied to non-software works (such as computer graphics, game scenarios...). | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
To be verified: | To be verified: | ||
* [http://www.wikiweise.de/wiki/Wikiweise%3AFreie%20Wiki-Lizenz Freie Wiki-Lizenz] | * [http://www.wikiweise.de/wiki/Wikiweise%3AFreie%20Wiki-Lizenz Freie Wiki-Lizenz] | ||
Controversial: | Controversial: | ||
* [http://iang.info/en IANG license] - seeks to enforce lots of things that are outside of the copyright realm (like organization scheme, right of developers to have a voice in the development process, etc.) | * [http://iang.info/en IANG license] - seeks to enforce lots of things that are outside of the copyright realm (like organization scheme, right of developers to have a voice in the development process, etc.) | ||
Revision as of 23:07, 11 May 2006
Tentatively, the following licenses are known to meet the criteria set out by the definition:
- Creative Commons Attribution License (not free for Debian)
- Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (not free for Debian)
- GNU Free Documentation License when no invariant sections are specified (this is important)
- Free Art License (not free for Debian)
- Against DRM 2.0
- All free software licenses. While many of them are specific to software, some are worded so as to apply to all kinds of digital works. For example, the GNU GPL is often applied to non-software works (such as computer graphics, game scenarios...).
In addition, works in the public domain are also free content as per the definition.
To be verified:
Controversial:
- IANG license - seeks to enforce lots of things that are outside of the copyright realm (like organization scheme, right of developers to have a voice in the development process, etc.)