Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

User talk:Nemo bis: Difference between revisions

From Definition of Free Cultural Works
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Revert: +re)
No edit summary
 
Line 4: Line 4:
::I did, yes. You said we should add [x] and [y], not why you deleted [z]. I am asking you to explain your thinking for removing what was there, not for adding what is not there. By the way, go ahead and just add in the links if you want. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 14:21, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
::I did, yes. You said we should add [x] and [y], not why you deleted [z]. I am asking you to explain your thinking for removing what was there, not for adding what is not there. By the way, go ahead and just add in the links if you want. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 14:21, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
:::Basically, I think it's a bad idea to start listing all the bad "licenses" in that page. I opened that discussion in those terms thinking we could discuss the matter more generally first, but if not restore the link and I can open a separate discussion for that later, there is no hurry. --[[User:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[User talk:Nemo bis|talk]]) 14:30, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
:::Basically, I think it's a bad idea to start listing all the bad "licenses" in that page. I opened that discussion in those terms thinking we could discuss the matter more generally first, but if not restore the link and I can open a separate discussion for that later, there is no hurry. --[[User:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[User talk:Nemo bis|talk]]) 14:30, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
::::Yes, please go ahead and add any external links you'd like--I trust your judgement and it's not like you are proposing to add dozens. What I keep on trying to ask is why you think this is bad. Please explain your reasoning. [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 14:35, 22 August 2018 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 18:35, 22 August 2018

Revert[edit]

Can you explain your thinking here? Thanks. Koavf (talk) 12:30, 22 August 2018 (EDT)

Did you see the talk page? --Nemo bis (talk) 13:35, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
I did, yes. You said we should add [x] and [y], not why you deleted [z]. I am asking you to explain your thinking for removing what was there, not for adding what is not there. By the way, go ahead and just add in the links if you want. Koavf (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
Basically, I think it's a bad idea to start listing all the bad "licenses" in that page. I opened that discussion in those terms thinking we could discuss the matter more generally first, but if not restore the link and I can open a separate discussion for that later, there is no hurry. --Nemo bis (talk) 14:30, 22 August 2018 (EDT)
Yes, please go ahead and add any external links you'd like--I trust your judgement and it's not like you are proposing to add dozens. What I keep on trying to ask is why you think this is bad. Please explain your reasoning. Koavf (talk) 14:35, 22 August 2018 (EDT)