Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Untitled==
| |
| Hi, | | Hi, |
|
| |
|
Line 5: |
Line 4: |
|
| |
|
| --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 23:06, 24 May 2006 (CEST) | | --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 23:06, 24 May 2006 (CEST) |
|
| |
| Although the IETF RFC documents are not completely free (allowance of [http://www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.html#derivs derivative works] is only required in the scope of the standard drafting process itself), I think it can work as a good example of essential freedoms applied to scientific/technical cooperation.
| |
|
| |
| If other movements use the complete set of essential freedoms for similar purposes, we can replace the IETF with those movements. What do you think? --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 01:24, 14 June 2006 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| == Free roleplaying? ==
| |
|
| |
| What is free roleplaying?
| |
|
| |
| Do we have a tag or something we can insert into a section like this which is empty, requesting <<please expand>> or similar?
| |
|
| |
| thanks :-)
| |
| --[[User:Mercury merlin|Mercury Merlin]] 22:45, 26 October 2006 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| : You can read some details [http://www.freeroleplay.org/ here]. Ricardo Gladwell, who founded the Free Roleplaying community, took part in this wiki at this beginning, but he seems to have [http://freecontentdefinition.org/index.php?title=Talk:Definition/Unstable&oldid=2129#Is_anyone_there.3F lost interest].
| |
| : The "free roleplaying" section was originally created for him to fill it in, since he has best knowledge of the subject. In his absence, perhaps we can write a few words and leave a pointer to http://www.freeroleplay.org for those who want to know more.
| |
| : --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 20:51, 27 October 2006 (CEST)
| |
|
| |
| : Section initiated, please expand and update. Some of these other sections also look a little thin on the ground, and can do with some further expansion. --[[User:Mercury merlin|Mercury Merlin]] 00:15, 10 November 2006 (CET)
| |
|
| |
| ------------------------------------------
| |
| : Obs: The link "[http://www.freeroleplay.org/]" don't work.
| |
| --[[Visit: allea torion] 7 December 2009 (from Brazil)
| |
|
| |
| == Metadata ==
| |
|
| |
| Some while ago, people in the [http://artlibre.org/ Free Art community] have been asking for a metadata format to recognize works of free art.
| |
|
| |
| An RDF schema was envisioned that would help tag free works of any kind (art, software, etc.). I have written [http://rdf.four-freedoms.org/ff.rdfs a simple draft of such a schema]. The aim was to establish in the technical field (markup, tools) the political importance of free contents. Since then, the project has been in deep sleep; perhaps we can revive it some day under the Free C(ontent|ulture) banner.
| |
|
| |
| Creative Commons already have their own metadata, which spans non-free as well as free works; my draft tried to inherit some of its vocabulary from the CC vocabulary, so as to enable interoperability (only for free works of course).
| |
|
| |
| The DOAP maintainer [http://lists.usefulinc.com/pipermail/doap-interest/2005-October/000158.html expressed interest] in such a project, noting however: ''"it seemed to me to require buy-in from more parties than I felt I could achieve in DOAP alone"''. [http://usefulinc.com/doap DOAP] (Description of a Project) is a metadata format which provides machine-readable tagging with semantics similar to the information provided by SourceForge and the like. Projects like the [http://directory.fsf.org/ FSF/UNESCO Free Software Directory] could use DOAP to store and spread metadata.
| |
|
| |
| ''(of course, the schema draft or even my understanding of RDF might be totally awful. I had no prior knowledge about the so-called "Semantic Web" when this project was first envisioned.)''
| |
|
| |
| --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 22:13, 20 May 2006 (CEST)
| |
| ----
| |
| :Moved from [[Talk:Metadata]] [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 22:00, 17 October 2013 (EDT)
| |
| ----
| |