Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| ---- | | ---- |
| __TOC__ | | __TOC__ |
| | |
| | == Need definition for "Unstable" as you know or understand it == |
| | |
| | Thoughts, anyone? Anyone at all that isn't a machine? |
|
| |
|
| == [[User:TruthWorldOrder]] Edits == | | == [[User:TruthWorldOrder]] Edits == |
Line 109: |
Line 113: |
|
| |
|
| : You don’t just change the stable version. See [[Authoring process]] for more information. --[[User:Mormegil|Mormegil]] ([[User talk:Mormegil|talk]]) 05:18, 26 March 2013 (EDT) | | : You don’t just change the stable version. See [[Authoring process]] for more information. --[[User:Mormegil|Mormegil]] ([[User talk:Mormegil|talk]]) 05:18, 26 March 2013 (EDT) |
|
| |
| == Permalink ==
| |
|
| |
| [[Definition]] should contain a link to [[Definition/1.1]] to make it easier for people to refer to that version specifically. (People who write books, for example, might not intend to link to [[Definition]] which is a moving target, but to [[Definition/1.1]] which their book refers to.)
| |
|
| |
| : I added the link into the grey introduction box. Do you think it is OK? --[[User:Mormegil|Mormegil]] ([[User talk:Mormegil|talk]]) 11:58, 17 February 2015 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Expire of licenses if break ==
| |
|
| |
| Some licenses, that are declared as free, expire, if you break them. I can't see that this restriction is allowed. -- [[User:David23x|David23x]] ([[User talk:David23x|talk]]) 10:55, 1 October 2015 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Source requirement on stable vs. optional source offer on unstable ==
| |
|
| |
| I have noticed, thanks to '''some''' people on a IRC channel on chat.freenode.net, that the stable version requires source files to be redistributed and be on a format/standard/codec that is friendly to free/libre software, while the unstable version puts redistribution of source files as an option.
| |
|
| |
| I, personally, see that, under the stable definition, almost no work would qualify as free/libre cultural work, not even those under free/libre licenses.
| |
|
| |
| I'm not a free/libre culture activist (I'm only a free/libre software activist that thinks that non-functional data (like images, sound, and such) should be at least shareable), but I just want to know why the changes related to this difference weren't made to the stable version? What's the reasoning for holding it? I know there's no consensus, but can you describe the points where the opinions
| |