MediaWiki API result

{
    "batchcomplete": "",
    "continue": {
        "gapcontinue": "The_non-commercial_provision_obfuscates_intent",
        "continue": "gapcontinue||"
    },
    "warnings": {
        "main": {
            "*": "Subscribe to the mediawiki-api-announce mailing list at <https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/mediawiki-api-announce.lists.wikimedia.org/> for notice of API deprecations and breaking changes."
        },
        "revisions": {
            "*": "Because \"rvslots\" was not specified, a legacy format has been used for the output. This format is deprecated, and in the future the new format will always be used."
        }
    },
    "query": {
        "pages": {
            "1664": {
                "pageid": 1664,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Restri\u00e7\u00f5es permiss\u00edveis",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "H\u00e1 certos requisitos e restri\u00e7\u00f5es ao uso ou interc\u00e2mbio de trabalhos que n\u00e3o sentimos que anule as liberdades essenciais na nossa defini\u00e7\u00e3o. Estas restri\u00e7\u00f5es s\u00e3o descritas a seguir. \n\nAl\u00e9m dessas restri\u00e7\u00f5es permitidas, a licen\u00e7a n\u00e3o deve incluir cl\u00e1usulas que limitem as liberdades essenciais. Especialmente, ela n\u00e3o deve especificar nenhuma restri\u00e7\u00e3o ao uso (Tais como proibir o uso comercial do trabalho, restringir o uso dependendo do contexto pol\u00edtico, etc.). \n\n== Atribui\u00e7\u00e3o dos autores ==\nAttribution protects the integrity of an original work, and provides credit and recognition for authors. A license may therefore require attribution of the author or authors, provided such attribution does not impede normal use of the work. For example, it would not be acceptable for the license to require a significantly more cumbersome method of attribution when a modified version of the licensed text is distributed.\n\n== Transmiss\u00e3o das liberdades ==\nThe license may include a clause, often called copyleft or share-alike, which ensures that derivative works themselves remain free works. To this effect, it can for example require that all derivative works are made available under the same free license as the original. \n\n== Prote\u00e7\u00e3o das liberdades ==\nThe license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work: for example, access to source code, or prohibition of technical measures restricting essential freedoms. \n\nRetrieved from \"http://freedomdefined.org/Permissible_restrictions\""
                    }
                ]
            },
            "1357": {
                "pageid": 1357,
                "ns": 0,
                "title": "Source Code",
                "revisions": [
                    {
                        "contentformat": "text/x-wiki",
                        "contentmodel": "wikitext",
                        "*": "==Definition==\nSource code is a delicate question to tackle in the broad context of free contents. For example, the GNU GPL defines it as ''\"the preferred form of the work for making modifications to [the work]\"''. Indeed, source code is of primary importance for many kinds of works (especially software).\n\nBut there are also situations where the idea of source code appears irrelevant or even meaningless. Consider a digital recording of a modern rock concert. How do we define \"source code\" ? No symbolic or textual transcription of the concert will be able to describe exactly (so as to reproduce accurately) the manner in which the guitarist picked the strings of his instruments, the slight variations in pitch or tempo of the singer, etc.\n\nEven if no \"source code\" can be made available for such a work, it would be counter-productive to qualify it as \"non-free\" if it satisfies to the other freedoms of free content.\n\nThus, let's define a criterion for knowing when source code is mandatory:\n* '''When the work or part of it is generated by computation from a  modifiable structured form (e.g. textual), this modifiable structured form is called ''source code''. It must be made available to recipients of the work.'''\n\n==Discussion of terms==\n* ''structured'': which gives access to the structure of the work (for example, an OpenDocument file gives access to the structure of the document, whereas a PDF file doesn't)\n* ''modifiable'': whose format allows easy modification (including modification of structure)\n* ''computation'': which does not involve any creative act from a human being\n\n==Transitivity==\nOf course, the source code must satisfy the freedoms of free content as well.\nTherefore, by recursion, our definition is not weaker than the one in the GNU GPL\n\n==Examples==\n* software source code\n* editable text (raw text, XML, word processor files...)\n* vector graphics files\n* tablatures, lyrics\n* multitracks from an audio recording\n* multitracks from any video recording"
                    }
                ]
            }
        }
    }
}