Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
User:Zotz: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edits by 67.205.2.187 (talk) to last revision by Zotz) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
drew | drew | ||
Ideas / notes for possible inclusion somewhere. | |||
* Finer grained license control over original creations than just the "work" which is copyrighted. The license should be able to be applied to a particular "instance" of a "work" by the original author and not automatically to all instances of the "work." Is this a good idea??? | |||
* clause to negate all rights to those who attempt to use the proposed WIPO broadcaster rights or anything similar? | |||
* re [by Omnifarious on advogate: "I agree strongly with the critique that you lack any major novelists or musicians as part of your group."] I don't see this as such a big concern and here are some thoughts on the issue: | |||
** This is an honest question: Was RMS a big/famous software developer when he came up with the idea for the GPL? If not... | |||
** While it might be nice, a major novelist or musician has pretty much succeeded in the current system. They may be steeped in "how things are done" - that said, the music industry, at least, is famous for messing up the artists, so you may find some willing to try a new way of doing things. Was it Chuck D who was making some noise a while back along these lines? | |||
** It is supposeldy not unusual for major changes to a system to come from those outside the system. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:26, 31 July 2011
[1] zotz at OurMeida
drew
Ideas / notes for possible inclusion somewhere.
- Finer grained license control over original creations than just the "work" which is copyrighted. The license should be able to be applied to a particular "instance" of a "work" by the original author and not automatically to all instances of the "work." Is this a good idea???
- clause to negate all rights to those who attempt to use the proposed WIPO broadcaster rights or anything similar?
- re [by Omnifarious on advogate: "I agree strongly with the critique that you lack any major novelists or musicians as part of your group."] I don't see this as such a big concern and here are some thoughts on the issue:
- This is an honest question: Was RMS a big/famous software developer when he came up with the idea for the GPL? If not...
- While it might be nice, a major novelist or musician has pretty much succeeded in the current system. They may be steeped in "how things are done" - that said, the music industry, at least, is famous for messing up the artists, so you may find some willing to try a new way of doing things. Was it Chuck D who was making some noise a while back along these lines?
- It is supposeldy not unusual for major changes to a system to come from those outside the system.