Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

User:Jpotvin/Free-Libre-Open Hardware Definition

From Definition of Free Cultural Works
< User:Jpotvin
Revision as of 17:03, 26 April 2019 by 180.254.177.188 (talk) (/* Free/Libre/Open israsuaiful5934@gmail.com)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Free/Libre/Open Hardware Definition[edit]

A device is considered "free/libre/open hardware" or "open hardware" if its designer, or design community, has distributed the device's essentials in a manner that:

A. Respects the freedom of others:

1. To use the device, in whole or in part, for any purpose;

2. To study how the device works, and to change it so it meets their needs;

3. To make and redistribute copies of the original or their modified versions, for free or otherwise;

B. Fulfills these preconditions:

4. Share essential documentation, requirements, design files, software and data under compatible free/libre/open licenses;israsyaiful5934@gmail.com

5. State the current system's functional completeness in relation to its requirements;

C. Avoids these restrictions:

6. Do not apply royalties to original or derived works;facebook.com

7. Do not discriminate against persons or groups;

8. Do not discriminate against fields of endeavour;

9. Do not tie to another license or to a non-disclosure agreement;

10. Do not tie to any particular product, technology or purpose;

11. Do not restrict other hardware or software's terms and conditions.

12. Do not impose cumbersome attribution requirements.

Economic Drivers of Open Hardware Methods for Projects[edit]

Augment Benefits

  • Knowledge-sharing & innovation through agile private-public-academic collaboration
    • Cross-industry
    • Cross-sector/Cross-departmental
    • International
  • End-to-end design, prototyping and production optimized for:
    • Iterative learning-by-making
    • Speed-to-market
    • Small quantities, prompt customization for niche requirements, mass-customization
    • Deep customization
    • Agility to accommodate rapidly changing requirements
  • Leverage of existing intellectual assets
  • Accept extreme competion with no barriers to entry
  • Diversify and decentralize talent and facilities
    • Opportunities for small/medium enterprise outside major cities
    • Everyday working linkages that are local, regional, national and global
  • Engage internal and external expertise
    • Different core competencies
    • Quality assurance community
    • Implementation community
  • "Re-shoring" reverses decades of "off-shoring"
    • Functions as a manufacturing business incubator, and as a direct showcase for investors
    • Skilled workers and students develop practical experience
    • Builds local income opportunities, keeps more money in the community

Manage Risk

  • Distribute risk amongst multiple investors
  • Protect the "knowledge commons"
  • Devices outlast their team/organization (sustainability)‏
  • Learn from peer review feedback
    • Praise and/or criticism
    • Confirmation/rejection of assumptions
    • Employee retention & succession management
  • Ideal for awkward, heavy, fragile or expensive devices
    • Finding the cheapest possible manufacturing is a less important factor in cost management
    • High-value individual units damaged, delayed, or lost in-transit are a major concern
  • Reduce risk exposure during turbulent times,
    • Currency exchange rate fluctuations driven by speculators
    • Availability of international commercial credit interruptions during financial crises
    • Transportation cost fluctuations due to fuel prices
    • Foreign labour issues that are less well understood than local issues
    • Negotiation and contracting across languages, cultures, legal jurisdictions and time-zones

Reduce Costs‏

  • Re-use components (own & others)‏
    • Redirect creativity, effort and spending out of redundancy and idiosyncrasy
    • Externalize some costs of creation/evolution
  • Reduce start-up times and delivery times
  • Engage international open vendor-neutral standards by default
  • More elegant modular architecture
  • More agile systems development
  • Eliminate most costs of rights protection, reverse-engineering, litigation, non-disclosure;
  • Flexibility to easily adapt to client requirements
  • Freedom to stand still (no forced obsolescence/upgrades)‏
  • Streamline and standardize management of licenses and agreements, greatly reducing legal costs