Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Talk:FAQ: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by 69.171.178.15 (talk) to last revision by Mormegil) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
re: What about logos? Why do all open source free content-supportive organisations currently have copyrighted logos? | re: What about logos? Why do all open source free content-supportive organisations currently have copyrighted logos? | ||
To my mind, the "main" or "proper" use of a trademark is to enable to "customer" to know who he is dealing with. | |||
Allowing a free for all use of trademarks and logos would negate these benefits to the "customers" (I will try and word this better later. | |||
To my mind, the "main" or "proper" use of a trademark is to enable to "customer" to know who he is dealing with. Allowing a free for all use of trademarks and logos would negate these benefits to the customers" (I will try and word this better later. | I have pondered recently the possibility of dual trademarks, one freely usable and one protected. Text versus graphic or logo based. So if you forked project foo, you could still call yours foo, but you would need to develop a new logo or graphical trademark. | ||
Does anyone see any merit to this idea at all? | |||
I have pondered recently the possibility of dual trademarks, one freely usable and one protected. Text versus graphic or logo based. So if you forked project foo, you could still call yours foo, but you would need to develop a new logo or graphical trademark. | |||
Does anyone see any merit to this idea at all? | |||
--[[User:Zotz|Zotz]] 01:23, 10 May 2006 (CEST) | --[[User:Zotz|Zotz]] 01:23, 10 May 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 11:07, 15 July 2011
re: What about logos? Why do all open source free content-supportive organisations currently have copyrighted logos?
To my mind, the "main" or "proper" use of a trademark is to enable to "customer" to know who he is dealing with. Allowing a free for all use of trademarks and logos would negate these benefits to the "customers" (I will try and word this better later. I have pondered recently the possibility of dual trademarks, one freely usable and one protected. Text versus graphic or logo based. So if you forked project foo, you could still call yours foo, but you would need to develop a new logo or graphical trademark. Does anyone see any merit to this idea at all?
--Zotz 01:23, 10 May 2006 (CEST)