Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Logos==
| |
| re: What about logos? Why do all open source free content-supportive organisations currently have copyrighted logos? | | re: What about logos? Why do all open source free content-supportive organisations currently have copyrighted logos? |
|
| |
|
Line 13: |
Line 12: |
| I have added a few paragraphs in the FAQ itself. I hope nobody minds. Also, I apologize for the likely English mistakes in those additions! | | I have added a few paragraphs in the FAQ itself. I hope nobody minds. Also, I apologize for the likely English mistakes in those additions! |
| --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 04:23, 10 May 2006 (CEST) | | --[[User:Antoine|Antoine]] 04:23, 10 May 2006 (CEST) |
| | |
|
| |
|
| == How Will People Make Money? == | | == How Will People Make Money? == |
Line 60: |
Line 60: |
|
| |
|
| I tried to click on the link to http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/2006/11/08/why-the-nc-permission-culture-simply-doesnt-work/ [1] but I got a "404 Not Found" error squawk. I also was not able to access (30-Jul-2008) the web site http://robmyers.org/ [2]; In fact, I googled [2], and the first "hit" was [2], but even the "cached" copy seemed to be a broken link. What is going on? (does my browser have the flu? It is Firefox 3.0.1). Thanks, [[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] 17:21, 30 July 2008 (EDT) | | I tried to click on the link to http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/2006/11/08/why-the-nc-permission-culture-simply-doesnt-work/ [1] but I got a "404 Not Found" error squawk. I also was not able to access (30-Jul-2008) the web site http://robmyers.org/ [2]; In fact, I googled [2], and the first "hit" was [2], but even the "cached" copy seemed to be a broken link. What is going on? (does my browser have the flu? It is Firefox 3.0.1). Thanks, [[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] 17:21, 30 July 2008 (EDT) |
|
| |
| By the way, http://web.archive.org/ does have some copies of some info from http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/ , [see e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20070630005855/http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/], but I was not able to find the content that the link called "[1]" above is supposed to be pointing to. Maybe [[User:Rob Myers]] could find it. Either it is not out there, or (INclusive or) I am an inept searcher... [[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] 17:26, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| Well, I did finally find a copy of the "de-reference"; it was in the google cache at
| |
| http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:uauKh1wctwEJ:www.robmyers.org/weblog/2006/11/08/why-the-nc-permission-culture-simply-doesnt-work/+rob+myers+weblog+2006+11&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
| |
| ...however, since it might not stay there for long, I also "cached" it on my hard drive. Is there a place on the web, that would be better to link to? (than [1]?) cheers, [[User:Mike Schwartz|Mike Schwartz]] 18:31, 30 July 2008 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == Attributing this definition ==
| |
|
| |
| I notice the "who wrote this" queston is blank. Some of the authors and collaborators are listed at [[History]], but I'm having a hard time citing this definition in an academic text - or rather, the authorship component. Normally, for a collaborative, wiki text, I will cite the site (ie Wikipedia, Meatball) - but what should I do here? [[User:Cormaggio|Cormaggio]] 04:10, 21 November 2008 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Free Content and Expression Definition??? ==
| |
|
| |
| Is it on purpose that the original name of the definition ("Free Content and Expression") is still in use here ?
| |
| [[User:Pierrem100|Pierre M]] 20:23, 14 January 2009 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| == Who administers this site? ==
| |
|
| |
| Okay the initiators of this site here are [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill|Benjamin Mako Hill]] and [[User:Erik Möller|Erik Möller]]. It's important to know where this project stands. If it was created with the ideas of wikimedia and FSF in mind, why not go ahead and write it in the FAQ? <small>'' -- The previous unsigned comment was made by [[User:Yamavu|Yamavu]] 01:15, 31 January 2009 ([http://freedomdefined.org/index.php?title=Talk%3AFAQ&diff=5617&oldid=5573 verify])''</small>
| |
| : Hello, Yamavu. Currently I am the most active administrator here, but I am focused on technical maintenance (vandalisms, spam, test edits...) Nevertheless, the questions you raise do require the attention of the project founders and policy makers. Cheers, ''[[User talk:Spiritia|→]][[User:Spiritia|<span class='autocomment'>Spiritia</span>]]'' 07:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == How does the Definition compare with the Debian Free Software Guidelines? ==
| |
|
| |
| The Debian project [in]famously takes freedom very seriously, and thus the [http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines|Debian Free Software Guidelines] are quite strict.
| |
|
| |
| How does the DFCW relate to the DFSG? Is it more strict, less strict, or incomparable? In other words: is a DFCW-free work necessarily DFSG-free, is a DFSG-free work necessarily DFCW-free, or are things more complicated (and if so, how)?
| |