Definition of Free Cultural Works - Recent changes [en]

Joa

190.166.88.26 — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:04:23 GMT

joa

New page

joa

User:UPURSNOTMINE

UPURSNOTMINE — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:20:42 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Yuxycn

Yuxycn — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:01:49 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Python.1

Python.1 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:53:32 GMT

New user account

New page

User:DEBIANE

DEBIANE — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:32:25 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:32, 8 February 2010
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~Document de~~ Khaled ~~DEBIANE~~	+	Khaled Debiane, Ingénieur et Formateur en hydraulique, Docteur en mécanique des fluides et transferts (INPG-UJF-CNRS), Maître de conférence avec 7 ans de gestion de projets de recherche en hydraulique dans le Laboratoire de rhéologie de Grenoble et un nombre de missions de formation à l'étranger (Maroc et Nouvelle Calédonie).
-	Ingénieur et ~~formateur~~ en hydraulique, ~~docteur~~ en mécanique des fluides et transferts (INPG-UJF-CNRS), ~~maître~~ de conférence : 7 ans de gestion de projets de recherche en hydraulique dans le ~~laboratoire~~ de ~~Rhéologie~~ de Grenoble ~~avec~~ un ~~certain~~ nombre de missions de formation à l'étranger.	+

User:DEBIANE

92.143.246.170 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:16:23 GMT

Created page with 'Document de Khaled DEBIANE Ingénieur et formateur en hydraulique, docteur en mécanique des fluides et transferts (INPG-UJF-CNRS), maître de conférence : 7 ans de gestion de p…'

New page

Document de Khaled DEBIANE
Ingénieur et formateur en hydraulique, docteur en mécanique des fluides et transferts (INPG-UJF-CNRS), maître de conférence : 7 ans de gestion de projets de recherche en hydraulique dans le laboratoire de Rhéologie de Grenoble avec un certain nombre de missions de formation à l'étranger.

User:Sharent

Sharent — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:58:01 GMT

New user account

New page

Template:Req By

74.127.132.25 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:57:28 GMT

Attribution:

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:57, 8 February 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	You must '''give proper attribution to the author and retain the license notice.'''		You must '''give proper attribution to the author and retain the license notice.'''
	\|}		\|}
		+	massq XXDV

User:Ignasrokas

Ignasrokas — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:13:19 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Stephenluk

Stephenluk — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:30:46 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Odin49

Odin49 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:50:46 GMT

New user account

New page

File:Hyd fluviale hecras.pdf

DEBIANE — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:51:05 GMT

uploaded "[[File:Hyd fluviale hecras.pdf]]" Les inondations d'un fleuve ou d’un torrent peuvent avoir des effets dévastateurs en son voisinage et créent actuellement un sujet de discussion entre chercheurs, agents publiques et bureaux d’études dans différents pays. Leurs préoccupations act

New page

User:Herculoid1962

Herculoid1962 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:26:09 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Mazda1352

Mazda1352 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:48:41 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Salboni

Salboni — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:16:44 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Angelheard73

Angelheard73 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:56:03 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Kspravintpr

Kspravintpr — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:59:55 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Pete.s

Pete.s — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 06:19:07 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Evi.parzefall

Evi.parzefall — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:38:21 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Atrudell

Atrudell — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:27:20 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Kkeangel

Kkeangel — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:55:06 GMT

New user account

New page

User:JOHN

JOHN — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:18:43 GMT

New user account

New page

شهادات التراخيص الحرة

85.240.139.87 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 17:23:45 GMT

hsdgdf

New page

----
uu65hu9io+jçmlk´p+oiuytrewqasdfghjklçº-.,mnbvcxz<
--[[Special:Contributions/85.240.139.87|85.240.139.87]] 17:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)ºo+hlbn bgvb bmb j j hjhghggfhggdr

User:Geraldine Sebastian

Geraldine Sebastian — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:23:32 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Loic88

Loic88 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:15:25 GMT

New user account

New page

Logos and buttons

Crwills — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:14:32 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 7 February 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	These buttons are in the public domain. Which color you use is your choice; we suggest red for music, black for science and software, and yellow for everything else.		These buttons are in the public domain. Which color you use is your choice; we suggest red for music, black for science and software, and yellow for everything else.
		+
		+	=== AllDzine's Images ===
		+
		+	The following set of Images were designed by [http://www.alldzine.com/ AllDzine]
		+
		+	[[Image:Digital-cc.jpg \| 200px]] [[Image:Cc3-1200x600.jpg \| 175px ]] [[Image:Cc4-1200x600.jpg \| 175px]]

	=== Small buttons ===		=== Small buttons ===

File:Cc4-1200x600.jpg

Crwills — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 07:11:49 GMT

uploaded "[[File:Cc4-1200x600.jpg]]" Digital CC - Image rendered using 3D Software Source - http://www.alldzine.com/design.html Published under CC. URL - http://www.alldzine.com

New page

Definition/Ar

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:26:15 GMT

Reverted edits by Sidi.mohamed (Talk) to last revision by Bramjco

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:26, 7 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{definition-langs}}		{{definition-langs}}
		+	<div dir="rtl">
		+	{{divbox\|gray\|Stable version\|This is stable version '''1.0''' of the definition. The version number will be updated as the definition develops. The editable version of the definition can be found at [[Definition/Unstable]]. See [[authoring process]] for more information, and see [[translations]] if you want to contribute a version in another language.}}

	== ملخص ==		== ملخص ==

User:Nizsa imuet

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:25:58 GMT

deleted "[[User:Nizsa imuet]]" Spamming: content was: '<html> <head> <title>yoguruto.tk</title> <meta name="description" content="yoguruto.tk"> <meta name="keywords" content="yoguruto"> </head>…' (and the only contributor was '[[Special:Contributions/Nizsa imuet|N

New page

Awareness

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:24:47 GMT

Reverted edits by Akif Afroz (Talk) to last revision by Spiritia

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 7 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Image:Free Content Definition at Wikimania.jpg\|thumb\|The Eye of Sauron sees all: DFCW title slide at Wikimania 2006]]		[[Image:Free Content Definition at Wikimania.jpg\|thumb\|The Eye of Sauron sees all: DFCW title slide at Wikimania 2006]]

-	~~Zyada udo mat allah ke ghar jana hai~~	+	==August 2006==
		+	;Wikimania
		+	:The DFCW was presented at [http://wikimania2006.wikimedia.org Wikimania 2006] by initiators [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill\|Benjamin Mako Hill]] and [[User:Erik Möller\|Erik Möller]].
		+
		+	;Commonwealth of Learning
		+	:[http://www.col.org/colweb/site/pid/4042 Sir John Daniel], President and Chief Executive Officer of the Commonwealth of Learning, recommends using DFCW licenses for Open Educational Resources
		+
		+	;Churchill Club of Australia
		+	:[http://www.churchillclub.org.au/23.asp?eventId=99 Future Directions for Free Content] by [[User:Angela Beesley\|Angela Beesley]]

	==March 2007==		==March 2007==

Akif Afroz Azmi

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:24:43 GMT

deleted "[[Akif Afroz Azmi]]" Test edits: content was: 'Hai i am Shaikh Akif Afroz Azmi At prsnt i am in btech Last year i was in bsc (hons) in AMU Dnt try to know more about me ok bye audience' (and the only contributor was 'Akif Afroz')

New page

Permissible restrictions

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:24:29 GMT

Reverted edits by 94.191.170.32 (Talk) to last revision by Spiritia

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 7 February 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	'''Weak Copyleft''' licenses require modified versions of the work to be distributed under the same license as the original work but allow it to be distributed with non-free cultural works - such as allowing photographs licensed under Free Culture licenses to be published with text which is not.		'''Weak Copyleft''' licenses require modified versions of the work to be distributed under the same license as the original work but allow it to be distributed with non-free cultural works - such as allowing photographs licensed under Free Culture licenses to be published with text which is not.

-	==== ~~Skydd av grundläggande rättigheter~~ ====	+	==== Protection of freedoms ====

-	~~Licensen kan innehålla klausuler som strävar efter att ytterligare säkerställa att arbetet är ett fritt arbete~~, ~~till exempel tillgång till~~''~~källkod~~'', ~~eller förbud mot~~''~~tekniska åtgärder~~''~~begränsa grundläggande friheter~~.	+	The license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work: for example, access to ''source code'', or prohibition of ''technical measures'' restricting essential freedoms.

-	* ~~Tillgång till källdata~~: ~~När ett slutligt verk har erhållits genom sammanställning eller bearbetning av konstruktion~~ information ~~eller en källfil eller flera källfiler~~, all ~~underliggande källdata ska finnas vid sidan av själva arbetet på samma villkor~~. ~~Detta kan vara en poäng i en musikalisk komposition~~, ~~de modeller som används i en~~ 3D~~-scen~~, ~~uppgifter för en vetenskaplig publikation~~, ~~ritningar och delar över en maskin eller annan sådan~~ information.	+	* Availability of source data: Where a final work has been obtained through the compilation or processing of design information or a source file or multiple source files, all underlying source data should be available alongside the work itself under the same conditions. This can be the score of a musical composition, the models used in a 3D scene, the data of a scientific publication, the drawings and parts list of a machine, or any other such information.
-	* ~~Användning av ett fritt~~ format: ~~För digitala filer~~, ~~bör det~~ format ~~i vilket verket görs tillgängligt ett~~ format ~~som bara kan läsas med hjälp av en särskild tillverkare program~~. ~~Formaten skall dokumenteras och bör inte skyddas av patent~~, ~~såvida inte en världsomfattande~~, ~~obegränsad och oåterkallelig royaltyfri bidraget ges att utnyttja den patenterade tekniken~~. ~~Medan icke~~-~~kanske~~ free ~~format används ibland av praktiska skäl~~, ~~ett fritt~~ format ~~kopia innebär att informationen skall vara tillgänglig för alla~~, ~~för alltid~~.	+	* Use of a free format: For digital files, the format in which the work is made available should a format that can only be read using a particular manufacturers programme. Formats should be documented and should not be protected by patents, unless a world-wide, unlimited and irrevocable royalty-free grant is given to make use of the patented technology. While non-free formats may sometimes be used for practical reasons, a free format copy means that the information will be accessible to everyone, for ever.
-	* ~~Inga tekniska begränsningar~~: ~~Verket måste vara tillgängligt i en~~ form ~~där inga tekniska åtgärder används för att begränsa de friheter som räknas upp ovan~~.	+	* No technical restrictions: The work must be available in a form where no technical measures are used to limit the freedoms enumerated above.
-	* ~~Inga andra restriktioner eller begränsningar~~: ~~Verket i sig får inte täckas av legala restriktioner~~ (~~patent~~, ~~kontrakt etcetera~~) ~~eller begränsningar~~ (~~till exempel rätten till privatliv eller är för icke~~-~~kommersiellt bruk~~) ~~som skulle hindra de friheter som räknas upp ovan~~. ~~Ett verk kan använda sig av befintliga juridiska undantag från upphovsrätten~~ (~~för att citera upphovsrättsskyddade verk~~), ~~men endast de delar av det som är otvetydigt fria utgör ett fritt arbete~~.	+	* No other restrictions or limitations: The work itself must not be covered by legal restrictions (patents, contracts, etc.) or limitations (such as privacy rights or being for non-commercial use only) which would impede the freedoms enumerated above. A work may make use of existing legal exemptions to copyright (in order to cite copyrighted works), though only the portions of it which are unambiguously free constitute a free work.

	== Restrictions which are not permissable==		== Restrictions which are not permissable==

Who's life is it anyway

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:24:08 GMT

deleted "[[Who's life is it anyway]]" content was: '#REDIRECT Whos life is it anyway' (and the only contributor was 'J4boat')

New page

Licenses/NC

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:22:44 GMT

Reverted edits by Fekes (Talk) to last revision by Church of emacs

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 7 February 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:
	There may be circumstances where -NC is the only (and therefore best) available option, but that number of circumstances should decrease as the business models around free content evolve.		There may be circumstances where -NC is the only (and therefore best) available option, but that number of circumstances should decrease as the business models around free content evolve.

-	~~'''''Tučný text'''''~~==Incompatibility==	+	==Incompatibility==

	[[Image:Robal.png\|thumb\|300px\|One of over 6,000,000 free photos, illustrations, sounds and videos uploaded to the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/ Wikimedia Commons], the media repository used by Wikipedia and its sister projects. All files on the Commons must be free for commercial use. This drawing of insect anatomy by Piotr Jaworski is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike license.]]		[[Image:Robal.png\|thumb\|300px\|One of over 6,000,000 free photos, illustrations, sounds and videos uploaded to the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/ Wikimedia Commons], the media repository used by Wikipedia and its sister projects. All files on the Commons must be free for commercial use. This drawing of insect anatomy by Piotr Jaworski is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike license.]]
Line 43:		Line 43:
	Communities like Wikimedia, Debian, or the scientific Open Access movement do not exist for their own gain -- they provide free knowledge and free software to the world. Putting your own content under a license recognized by these communities will keep it alive, and will encourage people to make active use of it in many different contexts. This does not merely apply to inherently collaborative works; almost any conceivable work in demand can be usefully transformed or incorporated into a collaborative context.		Communities like Wikimedia, Debian, or the scientific Open Access movement do not exist for their own gain -- they provide free knowledge and free software to the world. Putting your own content under a license recognized by these communities will keep it alive, and will encourage people to make active use of it in many different contexts. This does not merely apply to inherently collaborative works; almost any conceivable work in demand can be usefully transformed or incorporated into a collaborative context.

-	~~'''''Tučný text'''''~~== Basic and beneficial uses ==	+	== Basic and beneficial uses ==

	What is commercial use? The relevant clause out of Creative Commons non-commercial ("-NC") licenses, such as the "Attribution-NonCommercial" license, is this one:		What is commercial use? The relevant clause out of Creative Commons non-commercial ("-NC") licenses, such as the "Attribution-NonCommercial" license, is this one:

Licenses

Spiritia — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:22:12 GMT

Undo revision 7191 by Fekes (Talk) - no need to repeat this part and delete another

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 7 February 2010
Line 270:		Line 270:
	Unless additional permissions are granted, all FDL works contain unmodifiable sections which aren't called ''Invariant Sections'', such as a copy of the license embedded in the document itself.		Unless additional permissions are granted, all FDL works contain unmodifiable sections which aren't called ''Invariant Sections'', such as a copy of the license embedded in the document itself.

-	== ~~Criteria for choosing a license~~ ==	+	=== GNU General Public License ===

-	~~We explain hereafter some of the criteria which may influence your choice of a free content license~~. ~~Those criteria are not inherently good or bad~~. ~~The importance of each criteria depends on the context~~ (~~for example the kind of work, or the kind of collaborative process you want to encourage~~)~~, and on personal preferences.~~	+	* Aliases: GNU GPL, GPL
		+	* Current version: 3.0
		+	* Author: [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation]
		+	* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html License text (English)]

-	~~This list~~ is ~~not meant~~ to ~~be exhaustive. Other aspects may be important~~, ~~like~~ the ~~clarity of~~ the ~~wording~~ of ~~a license~~, or ~~the philosophy which is defended by its authors~~, ~~or whether the license is surrounded by an active community of authors~~.	+	The GNU GPL is, according to various statistics, probably the most used free software license. It was also the first license to implement the concept of [[#Copyleft\|copyleft]], guaranteeing that "GPL'ed" free software cannot become, or take part in, non-free software.

-	~~Endly, we want to stress that, '''before choosing a license, you must read~~ the ~~license text carefully.''' No summary, no matter how attractive or reassuring, can replace detailed understanding of the license itself.~~	+	Although the GPL is primarily intended for software programs, it is worded so as to apply to many different kinds of works. The main condition for the GPL to be applicable to a type of work is that it admits the notion of a ''preferred form of a work for making modifications to it'' (be it source code in a computer language, music score notation, digital graphics under a format retaining structure, etc.). For example, there are many occurences of text or graphics released under the GPL.
-		+
-	~~=== Intended scope ===~~	+
-		+
-	~~Some licenses strive to be as generic as~~ is ~~humanly (or rather, legally) possible. Others deliberately focus on a specific domain of creation, like~~ software~~, or documentation. When a license has such a focus~~, it ~~doesn't mean that it cannot be used for other kinds of works, but that its main area of use (and thus its social recognition~~ as ~~a trustable license) is clearly bounded.~~	+
-		+
-	~~For example, the GNU GPL can be used for~~ many kinds of works~~, but its~~ main ~~area of recognition is software.~~	+
-		+
-	~~=== Copyleft ===~~	+
-		+
-	~~[[Image:Fd_sq_icon_sa.svg\|48px]]~~	+
-		+
-	When a work is "copylefted", it means all derived works (even if they mix in other works as well) must be distributed under the same terms (usually the same exact license) as the original work. Conversely, a non-copylefted work can be distributed under different terms, and even be rendered non-free.	+
-		+
-	~~Therefore, using a copyleft license pretty much guarantees that users of subsequent works (~~for ~~example modified copies) will be granted~~ the same essential freedoms. On the other hand, a copyleft license can also limit opportunities for re-use, because most copyleft licenses are not compatible between each other. This is why people sometimes prefer non-copyleft license, depending on the work and the kind of practices they want to ~~encourage.~~	+
-		+
-	~~''ShareAlike'' is a synonym of ''copyleft'' in the Creative Commons vocabulary.~~	+
-		+
-	Strong copyleft also forbids linking or integration the subject work into larger works/projects that are not also licensed with a license with compatible copyleft terms. Weak copyleft lacks such a 'viral copyleft' requirement.	+
-		+
-	~~=== Practical modifiability ===~~	+
-		+
-	~~[[Image:Fd_sq_icon_sc.svg\|48px]]~~	+
-		+
-	~~Although all free licenses give you the ''legal'' right~~ to modify, not all of them try to specify how modifiability of the work is ''practically'' enforced. [[Source Code\|Requiring modifiability]] is important, especially for works which can be distributed under a ~~completely opaque format such as software binary code (''"object code"'').~~	+
-		+
-	~~The licenses which require practical modifiability usually define a notion~~ of ''source code'', ''source data'' or similar. The GNU FDL defines ''transparent copies'' and disallows use of technological protection measures (TPM). The Creative Commons licenses disallow use of TPMs.	+
-		+
-	~~=== Attribution ===~~	+
-		+
-	~~[[Image:Fd_sq_icon_by.svg\|48px]]~~	+
-		+
-	~~Requiring attribution means that authorship for the~~ work ~~must be recognized in any circumstances. In the context of derived works (modified copies), this includes the initial as well as subsequent authors and contributors.~~	+
-		+
-	It is ~~often stated~~ that all licenses can implicitly require attribution, as they mandate that the copyright notice must be kept intact when distributing copies. By including up-to-date authorship information in the copyright notice, one can indeed forbid subsequent works to erase that information. However, future contributions to the work are not guaranteed to be also credited using such a mechanism; indeed, it ~~is based on~~ the ~~good will~~ of ~~authors (or maintainers) of subsequent works. Having an Attribution requirement prevents this from happening and mandates that all subsequent works have the same policy in mentioning authorship.~~	+
-		+
-	~~Attribution is~~ a double-edged sword, as it may become a heavy burden to list all contributors for projects which imply seamless and massive collaboration (like Wikipedia). For many works it is, however, a reasonable requirement.	+
-		+
-	~~=== Related rights ===~~	+
-	~~[[Image:Fd_sq_icon_rr.svg\|48px]]~~	+
-		+
-	''~~Related rights'' concern not the mere copying and modification~~ of ~~the~~ work~~, but its use in a derived manner:~~ for ~~example, performing the work, displaying~~ it ~~in public or private, broadcasting, webcasting, etc. Related rights exist for various areas of creation~~ (~~songs, theater...); they often belong to people other than the authors of the work, such as perfomers, producers of phonograms, etc.~~	+
-		+
-	~~Some free content licenses take care to also grant related rights to the recipient of the work. There may even~~ be a ~~[[#Copyleft\|copyleft]] provision which states that related works (interpretations~~, ~~performances~~, ~~recordings) must be released~~ under ~~the same license as the work.~~	+
-		+
-	~~=== Access control prohibition ===~~	+
-		+
-	~~[[Image:Fd_sq_icon_drm.svg\|48px]]~~	+
-		+
-	~~Some licenses contain~~ a ~~clause~~, ~~which forbids to control access to the licensed content~~.	+
-	~~In some licenses this clause concerns only the licensee (licensor can use access control systems to forbid not granted rights~~).	+
-		+
-	~~→ [[w:Digital rights management\|DRM]]~~	+
-	~~<!-- please choose the Disambiguation of: [[w:TPM]] -->~~	+
-		+
-	~~=== Worldwide applicability ===~~	+
-		+
-	~~When distributing a free work over the world~~, ~~it is important to understand how people from other countries will be able to reuse this work.~~	+
-		+
-	~~License writers have adopted three different strategies regarding the internationalization~~ of ~~their licenses:~~	+
-	* ''same license for everyone'': only the original license text ~~(often in English) is given legal value, and translations may be provided purely for information purposes;~~	+
-	* ''exact translations'': translations of the original license text are provided, which all have legal value; those translations have exactly the same clauses and wording as the original text;	+
-	* ''local adaptations'': the license is rewritten according to each national legal system.	+
-		+
-	~~'''Attention: some licenses use a specific national law: so you cannot interpret the license through your national law, but through the law specified in the license.'''~~	+
-	~~For example, Free Art License uses French law (you must pay attention to French law also if the license is written in English, German~~ or ~~other languages).~~	+
-		+
-	~~The two first schemes ensure that everyone is given~~ the ~~same rights. In the third scheme (local adaptations), similarity and equivalence of the different versions should be carefully examined.~~	+
-		+
-	According to advocates of the adaptation scheme, licenses must be rewritten in order to cope with the peculiarities of the various legal systems. This position is held by the Creative Commons organization.	+
-		+
-	According to opponents of the adaptation scheme, having different national versions of a license presents the risk to break trust and interoperability. Also, they stress that the [http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/berne/trtdocs_wo001.html Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works] provides a framework which, with careful drafting, allows to write internationally applicable license texts. This position is held by the Free Software Foundation and by the Free Art License authors.	+

	=== Lizenz für Freie Inhalte ===		=== Lizenz für Freie Inhalte ===

User:SammySunbeam

SammySunbeam — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:28:44 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Speedy99999

Speedy99999 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:20:38 GMT

New user account

New page

User:Valeria

Valeria — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:45:53 GMT

New user account

New page

Permissible restrictions

94.191.170.32 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:48:13 GMT

Protection of freedoms:

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:48, 6 February 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	'''Weak Copyleft''' licenses require modified versions of the work to be distributed under the same license as the original work but allow it to be distributed with non-free cultural works - such as allowing photographs licensed under Free Culture licenses to be published with text which is not.		'''Weak Copyleft''' licenses require modified versions of the work to be distributed under the same license as the original work but allow it to be distributed with non-free cultural works - such as allowing photographs licensed under Free Culture licenses to be published with text which is not.

-	==== ~~Protection of freedoms~~ ====	+	==== Skydd av grundläggande rättigheter ====

-	~~The license may include clauses that strive to further ensure that the work is a free work: for example~~, ~~access to~~ ''~~source code~~'', ~~or prohibition of~~ ''~~technical measures~~'' ~~restricting essential freedoms~~.	+	Licensen kan innehålla klausuler som strävar efter att ytterligare säkerställa att arbetet är ett fritt arbete, till exempel tillgång till''källkod'', eller förbud mot''tekniska åtgärder''begränsa grundläggande friheter.

-	* ~~Availability of source data~~: ~~Where a final work has been obtained through the compilation or processing of design~~ information ~~or a source file or multiple source files~~, all ~~underlying source data should be available alongside the work itself under the same conditions~~. ~~This can be the score of a musical composition~~, ~~the models used in a~~ 3D ~~scene, the data of a scientific publication~~, ~~the drawings and parts list of a machine~~, ~~or any other such~~ information.	+	* Tillgång till källdata: När ett slutligt verk har erhållits genom sammanställning eller bearbetning av konstruktion information eller en källfil eller flera källfiler, all underliggande källdata ska finnas vid sidan av själva arbetet på samma villkor. Detta kan vara en poäng i en musikalisk komposition, de modeller som används i en 3D-scen, uppgifter för en vetenskaplig publikation, ritningar och delar över en maskin eller annan sådan information.
-	* ~~Use of a free~~ format: ~~For digital files~~, ~~the~~ format ~~in which the work is made available should a~~ format ~~that can only be read using a particular manufacturers programme~~. ~~Formats should be documented and should not be protected by patents~~, ~~unless a world-wide~~, ~~unlimited and irrevocable royalty-free grant is given to make use of the patented technology~~. ~~While non~~-free ~~formats may sometimes be used for practical reasons~~, ~~a free~~ format ~~copy means that the information will be accessible to everyone~~, ~~for ever~~.	+	* Användning av ett fritt format: För digitala filer, bör det format i vilket verket görs tillgängligt ett format som bara kan läsas med hjälp av en särskild tillverkare program. Formaten skall dokumenteras och bör inte skyddas av patent, såvida inte en världsomfattande, obegränsad och oåterkallelig royaltyfri bidraget ges att utnyttja den patenterade tekniken. Medan icke-kanske free format används ibland av praktiska skäl, ett fritt format kopia innebär att informationen skall vara tillgänglig för alla, för alltid.
-	* ~~No technical restrictions~~: ~~The work must be available in a~~ form ~~where no technical measures are used to limit the freedoms enumerated above~~.	+	* Inga tekniska begränsningar: Verket måste vara tillgängligt i en form där inga tekniska åtgärder används för att begränsa de friheter som räknas upp ovan.
-	* ~~No other restrictions or limitations~~: ~~The work itself must not be covered by legal restrictions~~ (~~patents~~, ~~contracts, etc.~~) ~~or limitations~~ (~~such as privacy rights or being for non~~-~~commercial use only~~) ~~which would impede the freedoms enumerated above~~. ~~A work may make use of existing legal exemptions to copyright~~ (~~in order to cite copyrighted works~~), ~~though only the portions of it which are unambiguously free constitute a free work~~.	+	* Inga andra restriktioner eller begränsningar: Verket i sig får inte täckas av legala restriktioner (patent, kontrakt etcetera) eller begränsningar (till exempel rätten till privatliv eller är för icke-kommersiellt bruk) som skulle hindra de friheter som räknas upp ovan. Ett verk kan använda sig av befintliga juridiska undantag från upphovsrätten (för att citera upphovsrättsskyddade verk), men endast de delar av det som är otvetydigt fria utgör ett fritt arbete.

	== Restrictions which are not permissable==		== Restrictions which are not permissable==

Licenses/NC

Fekes — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:25:25 GMT

Basic and beneficial uses:

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 6 February 2010
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 21:		Line 21:
	There may be circumstances where -NC is the only (and therefore best) available option, but that number of circumstances should decrease as the business models around free content evolve.		There may be circumstances where -NC is the only (and therefore best) available option, but that number of circumstances should decrease as the business models around free content evolve.

-	==Incompatibility==	+	'''''Tučný text'''''==Incompatibility==

	[[Image:Robal.png\|thumb\|300px\|One of over 6,000,000 free photos, illustrations, sounds and videos uploaded to the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/ Wikimedia Commons], the media repository used by Wikipedia and its sister projects. All files on the Commons must be free for commercial use. This drawing of insect anatomy by Piotr Jaworski is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike license.]]		[[Image:Robal.png\|thumb\|300px\|One of over 6,000,000 free photos, illustrations, sounds and videos uploaded to the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/ Wikimedia Commons], the media repository used by Wikipedia and its sister projects. All files on the Commons must be free for commercial use. This drawing of insect anatomy by Piotr Jaworski is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike license.]]
Line 43:		Line 43:
	Communities like Wikimedia, Debian, or the scientific Open Access movement do not exist for their own gain -- they provide free knowledge and free software to the world. Putting your own content under a license recognized by these communities will keep it alive, and will encourage people to make active use of it in many different contexts. This does not merely apply to inherently collaborative works; almost any conceivable work in demand can be usefully transformed or incorporated into a collaborative context.		Communities like Wikimedia, Debian, or the scientific Open Access movement do not exist for their own gain -- they provide free knowledge and free software to the world. Putting your own content under a license recognized by these communities will keep it alive, and will encourage people to make active use of it in many different contexts. This does not merely apply to inherently collaborative works; almost any conceivable work in demand can be usefully transformed or incorporated into a collaborative context.

-	== Basic and beneficial uses ==	+	'''''Tučný text'''''== Basic and beneficial uses ==

	What is commercial use? The relevant clause out of Creative Commons non-commercial ("-NC") licenses, such as the "Attribution-NonCommercial" license, is this one:		What is commercial use? The relevant clause out of Creative Commons non-commercial ("-NC") licenses, such as the "Attribution-NonCommercial" license, is this one:

User:NYAWA

NYAWA — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:26:57 GMT

New user account

New page