Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!

Licenses: Difference between revisions

From Definition of Free Cultural Works
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(IANG license (to be verified))
(invariant sections are not "free")
Line 2: Line 2:
* [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution License]
* [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution License]
* [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License]
* [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License]
* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License]
* [http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html GNU Free Documentation License] when no invariant sections are specified (this is important)
* [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License]
* [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License]
* All [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html free software licenses], including the GNU GPL, the BSD license, and various others. These are sometimes also used for works which are not software.
* All [http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html free software licenses], including the GNU GPL, the BSD license, and various others. These are sometimes also used for works which are not software.

Revision as of 20:03, 1 May 2006

Tentatively, the following licenses are known to meet the criteria set out by the definition:

In addition, works in the public domain are also free content as per the definition.

To be verified:

Controversial:

  • Against DRM license - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license.