Version 1.1 of the definition has been released. Please help updating it, contribute translations, and help us with the design of logos and buttons to identify free cultural works and licenses!
Licenses: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Erik Möller (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
(IANG license (to be verified)) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
To be verified: | To be verified: | ||
* [http://www.wikiweise.de/wiki/Wikiweise%3AFreie%20Wiki-Lizenz Freie Wiki-Lizenz] | * [http://www.wikiweise.de/wiki/Wikiweise%3AFreie%20Wiki-Lizenz Freie Wiki-Lizenz] | ||
* [http://iang.info/en IANG license] | |||
Controversial: | Controversial: | ||
* [http://www.freecreations.org/Against_DRM.html Against DRM license] - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license. | * [http://www.freecreations.org/Against_DRM.html Against DRM license] - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license. | ||
Revision as of 18:46, 1 May 2006
Tentatively, the following licenses are known to meet the criteria set out by the definition:
- Creative Commons Attribution License
- Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License
- GNU Free Documentation License
- Free Art License
- All free software licenses, including the GNU GPL, the BSD license, and various others. These are sometimes also used for works which are not software.
In addition, works in the public domain are also free content as per the definition.
To be verified:
Controversial:
- Against DRM license - very vague, legally speaking, about what exactly it tries to forbid. If it forbids use even for developing DRM, bundling with DRM, etc., it is not a free content license.